Showing posts with label Kurt Vonnegut. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kurt Vonnegut. Show all posts

Saturday, February 5, 2011

Slaughter-House Five

          Time travel and interplanetary travel as both narrative device and critique on Western assumptions of the absoluteness of time and space allow Kurt Vonnegut to interweave and interrelate the two World Wars to the Vietnam War. References to the painting The Spirit of ’76, the novel The Red Badge of Courage (Simon & Schuster Enriched Classic), and the battle for Hill 875 affiliate the Revolutionary War, the Civil War and the Korean War to his deconstruction of political metanarratives of patriotism. Time travel allows a juxtaposition of the lies told to Pilgrim’s (and Vonnegut’s) generation about WWII to be inscribed on the war of his son’s generation, the Vietnam War. Voyages to Tralfamadore also undermine American metanarratives as the aliens provide an outsider’s perspective to the narrative.
The metanarrative of American imperialism calls for the sacrifice of its citizens (mainly young men) to expand its “much-envied” systems of capitalism and democracy to better the lives of those under the “oppressive” system of communism. Vonnegut undermines these presumptions by retelling his experience at Dresden when Americans bombed civilians under false pretences. Americans, not the enemy, are shown to be “a threat to world peace” (142). Even the disjoined paragraph structure of the novel undermines grand narratives, allowing for gaps in memory, enforced and voluntary silence, and repressed memory. These breaks in narrative emulate the absence of the Dresden raid in the Official History of the Army Air Force in World War Two, a conscious decision to keep the events “a secret from the American people” (191). Likewise, the inclusion of living people into a world of fictional characters, some of whom appear in the context of Vonnegut’s other novels, causes the reader to doubt the authenticity of the information provided, thereby calling into question the authoritative voice of historians. For instance the fictive Howard W. Campbell, Jr, the protagonist of Vonnegut’s earlier novel Mother Night, quotes an actual line attributed to the American humorist Kin Hubbard in his critique of capitalism, which he calls America’s “most destructive untruth” (129). Capitalism, he claims, has made American prisoners-of-war the “most self-pitying, least fraternal, and dirtiest of all prisoners of war...incapable of concerted action” (131), hence not the exemplars of “truth, justice, and the American way” which the metanarrative presupposes. As the narrator relates, there are almost no Supermans, almost no All-American boy heroes in this story. Throughout the narrative only Edgar Derby stands up for the American ideals of “freedom and justice and opportunities and fair play for all” (164), only to be killed for a petty crime soon afterwards. Hence, the hero does not triumph as in a Greek epic, but is doomed. Even in the commodity of ideas, the best ideas, like those of Kilgore Trout, cannot rise to the top if, like Trout’s novels, the “prose [is] frightful” (110). The packaging and marketing of ideas, heroes, ideologies, etc is shown to outweigh their inherent value, thus undermining capitalist ideals. Democracy, another component of “the American way,” is also ridiculed through Edgar Derby’s election as the leader of the American prisoners-of-war. An Englishman calls for nominations, when there are none, the Englishman nominates Derby for them, after which two or three of the hundreds of soldiers second the motion while “[m]ost of the Americans were in stupors or asleep” (144).
The Traflamadorians’ ability to observe a fourth dimension, allowing for the collapsing of chronological time, attacks the foundation of history and the causal relationships of the metanarratives (example: if you are good, you will be rewarded, if bad, you will be punished).  Their perspective of reality differs greatly from that of the metanarratives propagated by Western societies. Narratives concerning sex and reproduction (114), chronological linear time (114), war and peace (117), free will (151), the form of human bodies (87), Christianity (108-110), conceptions of beauty (113), etc are all shown to be faulty, subject to the same perspective-shifting as changing of a pair of eyeglasses, being blind, or suffering from blurred vision engenders (emphasized by Billy Pilgrim’s vocation of optometrist). In fact the Tralfamadorians’ ability to see the future as a fact already accomplished indicates that the American-centric belief of causing the destruction of the universe is completely unfounded, since a banal mistake made by a Tralfamadorian test pilot will bring its demise. Depthlessness, as Jameson suggests, reigns. Similarly both the “Three Musketeers,” as signifying to Billy Pilgrim the death of three fellow combatants, and the “Milky Way,” as a reality to him in his space travels, are both reduced to commodities: the candy bars his wife consumes. 

Tuesday, March 30, 2010

QUEUC (Quebec Universities English Undergraduate Conference)

I just got back from a wonderful weekend at Bishop's University.  It was the first annual undergraduate conference for English literature students in Quebec (QUEUC).  I went with five other students from Université Laval to present a paper on Frederick Douglass (see a summary at my blogpost here).  There were a large range of topics presented from students from Concordia, McGill, U. of Montreal, U. of Sherbrooke, as well as from Bishop's. Of course there were the standard Shakespeare papers read, but also works from more obscure authors.  As there were 55 presenters, I did not have the opportunity to hear all the papers, but those I did were excellent.  The conference was divided into 14 panels separated thematically.  The panel I was apart of was entitled "Patriarchy, Parenting, and Personas."  There was a comparison of the use of blues music in Langston Hughes' poem "The Weary Blues" with bebop in Jack Kerouac's San Francisco Blues.  Having read both Hughes and Kerouac this semester in my American novel class, her exploration of how music was central to their poetry was interesting.

The other three presentations were by students from Bishop's who commented upon Zora Neal Hurston's Their Eyes Were Watching God and Kurt Vonnegut's Bluebeard: A Novel (Delta Fiction).  The first presenter reviewed the role of patriarchy in the life of the main character, Janie, of Their Eyes Were Watching God.  Janie is a young black woman who had been raised by her grandmother.  After being "put on the marriage auction block" at the age of sixteen by her grandmother, she reluctantly marries Logan, an older man.  He expects her to do heavy work on his farm, seeing her more as a farmhand than a wife, so she runs off with Jody.  Once again she finds herself in a patriarchal relationship; Jody, the newly elected town mayor, wants her to be a trophy wife.  After being widowed, she falls in love with a vagabond, "Tea Cake" and finally finds an equal, although imperfect, marriage.

The second applied the framework of feminist psychoanalyst Nancy Chodorow to both Hurston's and Vonnegut's novels.  Based on Freud's Oedipus Complex, Chodorow expands the theory so that for both girls and boys the mother is the first love.  Hence, for males, the love for the mother is therefore replaced by the love for the wife, but for women, they can never truly love a man, so their love for the mother is replaced by the love of a child.  The presenter then revealed the how this theory was upheld in the novels and also how it was unreliable.

Lastly, the third of these presentations concerned autobiography's importance in the novel.  In Their Eyes Were Watching God, the narrative is orally transmitted to the protagonist's best friend, Pheoby, whereas Vonnegut writes Bluebeard as the fictional autobiography of the fictional painter, Rabo Karabekian.  In Bluebeard the writing style is affected as he experiences the events he writes about.  The presentation explored the differences in style and influence that these fictional "pretending to be" autobiographies had.


   


One of the other students from Laval spoke about murder in Hamlet and MacBeth.  The other four students from Laval spoke on American works.  Jonathan considered the change of Henry Fleming's identity throughout Stephen Crane's novel The Red Badge of Courage.  Simon revealed how "Ragged Dick" denied his true selfhood while pursing American Dream in Horatio Alger's children's book Ragged Dick.  And Jenny spoke on Nathaniel Hawthorn's transcendental tendencies (rather than the common Puritan beliefs of his era) in his own life and in his novel The Scarlet Letter.  Lastly Kathleen used PowerPoint slides to show Jacob Riis' influence on modern-day photojournalism, especially through his work How the Other Half Lives (referring to the poor of New York City).


   


Although, as you can tell, it was a very intellectual weekend (Jenny called it the most intellectual weekend in her life), we had soooo much fun!  It was great getting to know each other better.